February 27, 2004
Canadians Want Drug-Impaired Driving Legislation
-- New marijuana law opens door for toking and driving
--
Overwhelmingly, Canadians want to see new drug-impaired
driving legislation and Mothers Against Drunk Driving is urging
the Federal Government to immediately introduce measures that
will accompany the loosening of marijuana possession laws.
In a recent public opinion survey, nine in ten Canadians support
‘creating new drug-impaired driving laws to keep the
roads safe from those who will toke and drive.’
In a SES national phone survey, 89.7% of respondents
strongly supported or somewhat supported new drug-impaired
driving laws. There were 7.7% of respondents that opposed
new laws and 2.2% were unsure.
“This kind of public support clearly indicates
to the Prime Minister that he should have safeguards in place
as he is loosening possession laws,” says Louise Knox,
MADD Canada’s National President. “There will
be a huge problem created by this new law, when drivers are
toking and driving, and police are unable to charge them with
impaired driving. The Government is well aware of solutions
that can be introduced tomorrow to ensure police have the
authority and the means to properly detect, test and charge
an drug-impaired driver.”
“There is no practical reason why the
Government needs to rush this marijuana legislation and place
it above Canadians’ safety on the roads.” Mrs.
Knox adds, “We are disappointed with the Justice Minister’s
statement that they will move on drug impaired driving at
sometime down the road – it’s kind of like talking
about fitting a harness after you’ve let the horse out
of the stable.”
With the passage of C-10 and no accompanying
drug-impaired driving legislation, MADD Canada believes the
Government is increasing drivers’ risk on the roads
and, at the same time, not providing for appropriate police
enforcement. It cites an Ottawa case in which a person was
acquitted even though he was smoking marijuana while driving.
In this case, the judge stated there was not enough evidence
to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was impaired.
Mrs. Knox observes, “This opens the door for increased
impaired driving trips, and the potential for even greater
human carnage as a result of impaired driving.”
“Public support for this initiative is
remarkable,” remarks Nik Nanos of SES, who conducted
the national survey. “Canadians are concerned about
the ramifications of people toking and driving -- no one wants
to be a victim of an impaired driver. It is a public safety,
no-nonsense issue that has resonated with the people.”
The survey question read: ‘The federal
government is decriminalizing marijuana and loosening the
possession laws without introducing drug-impaired driving
measures. Police and groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving
are calling for new drug-impaired driving legislation that
will allow police to effectively apprehend and test drug-impaired
drivers. Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat
oppose or strongly oppose creating new drug-impaired driving
laws to keep the roads safe from those who will toke and drive?’
The survey was part of the SES National Survey,
conducted late January, with a sample of 1,000 Canadians.
The results are accurate within 3.1 percent, plus or minus,
19 times out of 20.
MADD Canada has been active in voicing its opposition
to Bill C-10, along with national police partners –
Canadian Professional Police Association, Canadian Association
of Chiefs of Police, Canadian Association of Police Boards
Association and the CEUDA, the Canadian union of customs officers.
To read the Open Letter to the Prime Minister and for more
information, visit the MADD Canada website – www.madd.ca.
For more information or an interview, visit
www.madd.ca, or call Louise
Knox, MADD Canada’s National President, at: 1-866-900-6233
or 780-993-9160.
Also see -
An Open Letter Concerning
Bill C-10 Decriminalization Of Marijuana